News + Resources

CLIENT ALERT – Changes in Ohio Limited Liability Company Law

Ohio’s Limited Liability Company law, as it exists in Ohio Revised Code (“ORC”) Section 1705 (the “Original Act”), was originally enacted in 1994. On January 8, 2021, Governor Mike DeWine…

Read More

Jay Carson Files Amicus Brief Urging the Court for Protection from Government Overreach

On November 29, 2021, Jay Carson, on behalf of Wegman Client The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief with the Ohio Supreme Court.  The brief urges the Court to protect…

Read More

CLIENT ALERT – Update to Proposed Tax Changes

After weeks of negotiations, the most recent iteration of the Build Back Better Act, was released by Congress on November 3, 2021 and represents a notable shift from the earlier House Ways and Means tax proposals released on September 13, 2021 (this previous version of the tax proposals was discussed in our September 29, 2021 Client Alert). The House plans to pass the final version of the Act the week of November 15. Please note that this is proposed legislation – subject to change.

To read more, download the Client Alert below.

 

Read More

Jay Carson Files Amicus Brief Urging Protection from the Charging of Excess Fines

On November 5, 2021, Jay Carson, on behalf of Wegman Client The Buckeye Institute filed an amicus brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.  The brief urges the Court to protect citizens from excessive fines in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

The issue arose when Andrew Stevens and Melanie Copenhaver filed suit in federal district court against the City of Columbus.  The suit was in response to the city’s citation of Mr. Stevens and Ms. Copenhaver’s property which had been landscaped, but had not been approved by the city’s Historic Resources Commission.  The city’s citation has a hefty price tag of between $100 and $1,000 per day.  The suit challenged the excessive fines and the ordinance which allows for the city to determine acceptable landscaping.  In July of 2020, the district court ruled against Stevens and Copenhaver denying their request for injunctive and declaratory relief. Thus, prompting Stevens and Copenhaver to appeal this decision to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The amicus brief urges the Court to reverse the district court’s ruling in favor of the City of Columbus.  The brief describes why excessive fines  not only don’t  work and are in direct violation of the Eighth Amendment, but also how these types of fines are an intrusion of one’s privacy. “Although the right to be free of excessive fines is ancient, governments-whether through king or court or legislature – have often yielded to the temptation to abuse their power to levy fines . . . The guarantee against excessive fines has provided a check against governmental overreach for forty generations.”

 

 

 

Read More

Resource Categories